Londoner wrote:No I disagree. He fired many shots. He shot to kill. He is guilty of murder. The support arrived after 1.30 minutes. Obviously he could have waited for a while before shooting. He didn't have to confront the victim, he should have waited for the support. He confronted and aggravated some one who was out of order to make the situation worst.
Have you read any of the transcripts from the grand jury or seen the interview that Officer Wilson gave on the George Stephanopoulos. The dead thug attacked him in his vehicle (that is Brown started the incident) and tried to appropriate his sidearm- after punching Wilson several times in the head and face; Brown was 6'4," 290lbs (2m, 132kg)- a huge individual- and he was going to tackle him when the officer got out of the car and told him to get on the ground- the victim caused his own demise with his actions and had he gotten on the ground as he was instructed to do and not decided to charge the officer he would not be dead. Use some common sense: if you just assaulted a police officer and he points his gun at you and tells you to get on the ground would you charge him at him instead? Or- you beat on a cop pretty badly, try to steal his weapon, and expect him to not shoot you? The alternative is Wilson gets beaten up, his sidearm taken, and shot to death with it.
So, pray tell,Officer Wilson should've waited the 1.30 for the backup to arrive- during which he would've been easily overpowered, his weapon taken, and he shot with it? I don't think so- Officer Wilson did his job and neutralized an aggressive individual who was high on pot at the time.
What lies have already been told about this incident by witnesses who obviously committed perjury? They're going to get away with it by the way.
Michael Brown:
Was shot in the back.
Had his hands up.
Said "Don't shot me!"
Was shot-execution style.
Had the entire 9 round magazine of the .40cal P229 shot into him (nevermind that 3 rounds were already fired).
He was a 'gentle giant.' (I wonder if the Indian store clerk he beat up and threw about would agree?)
Etc.
All lies.
Facts don't support the fantasy the agitators have constructed and a fairly cut-and-dry case of self-defense is being made much worse by the verminous civil rights racketeers and race-baiters- as I've said racial agitation is a huge industry in the U.S. and plenty of people, in politics, in media, etc., have a vested interest into making this tragedy 'into a mountain from a mole-hill.'
The rioting mobs- do you think they are all angry black people by the way?
From earlier in the year:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/08 ... -ferguson/
"As the outraged community in Ferguson, Missouri, continues to protest the officer-involved shooting of 18-year-old Michael Brown, radical communist revolutionaries from places like Chicago and New York City are seemingly infiltrating the local demonstrations and allegedly attempting to “incite” riots..."
Anarchists, radical commies, New Black Panthers (black KKK), etc. Whenever there's a protest in America there's a good chance that vermin like this will be there trying to cause a disturbance- and a situation like a black teenager shot dead by a white police officer is too good for them to pass up. Iraq might have lunatics like the ISIS fanatics but America has its own brand of lunatics who thinks that the ends justifies the means- the radical communist crowd.
