Terrorism (Darkseid's Believe it or not)
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:52 pmThe whole world is gripped on the reality of terrorism and much of its inhabitants seeks shelter and protection from this alarming threat. But is terrorism actually real?
According popular media, "Terrorism is the spread of disconsent and disorder from a group of mad lunatics by means of violent acts carried in the intent of spreading terror for no appearant, logical reason." According to Bin Laden, "Terrorism is the justfiable act of god's people against its oppressors and unwanted people." According to intellectuals, "Terrorism is the desperate cry of help by any group of people that has to resort to terror tactics in order preserve their people from oppression. According to the true definition, "Terrorism is any act that involves inflicting terror for any specific rationale"
But can oppression not be terrorism? Oppression is the act to oppress any group of people by the will and rational of another. Inflicting terror is a good means of oppressing someone. Therefore terrorism does exist, at least in its true definition and as a part of oppression. Now let's see if the same can be said about the popular definition.
Could it be possible that all terrorist attacks or almost all of them are conducted by the government to oppress its own people? Could it be possible that the United States was attacked from within rather than from afar? Could al-Queda not be responsible nor entirely responsible for the destruction of the world trade center? Could it be possible that George W. Bush is the true terrorist of his own country?
Also, could every other country that was attacked by Terrorism be conducting those attacks it self on its own people? Could Terrorism really be just a tactic of oppression?
Now its your turn. You tell me.
According popular media, "Terrorism is the spread of disconsent and disorder from a group of mad lunatics by means of violent acts carried in the intent of spreading terror for no appearant, logical reason." According to Bin Laden, "Terrorism is the justfiable act of god's people against its oppressors and unwanted people." According to intellectuals, "Terrorism is the desperate cry of help by any group of people that has to resort to terror tactics in order preserve their people from oppression. According to the true definition, "Terrorism is any act that involves inflicting terror for any specific rationale"
But can oppression not be terrorism? Oppression is the act to oppress any group of people by the will and rational of another. Inflicting terror is a good means of oppressing someone. Therefore terrorism does exist, at least in its true definition and as a part of oppression. Now let's see if the same can be said about the popular definition.
Could it be possible that all terrorist attacks or almost all of them are conducted by the government to oppress its own people? Could it be possible that the United States was attacked from within rather than from afar? Could al-Queda not be responsible nor entirely responsible for the destruction of the world trade center? Could it be possible that George W. Bush is the true terrorist of his own country?
Also, could every other country that was attacked by Terrorism be conducting those attacks it self on its own people? Could Terrorism really be just a tactic of oppression?
Now its your turn. You tell me.