Iraqi Kurdistan's Islamist Parties Condemn Egyptian Coup

[Aslan]

While secular parties in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq have remained silent toward the downfall of the rule of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Kurdish Islamic movements expressed their concern about what they considered a coup against democracy and legitimacy in the Middle East.

The Egyptian army had ousted Islamic President Mohammed Morsi on July 3, 2013, and declared a political transition enjoying popular support and solidarity from political and religious leaders and youth.
The Kurdistan Islamic Union (KIU), an influential opposition party in the Kurdistan region that retains the Brotherhood’s ideology, expressed concerns over the recent events in Egypt and the use of force for ousting Morsi.

The KIU, which controls six out of 111 seats in the Kurdistan regional parliament, held a meeting for its political bureau on July 4, 2013, to discuss the “military coup in Egypt.” According to the party’s statement posted on its website, “The political bureau expressed concern regarding the use of force by the army in political conflicts, and the party believes that what happened was a military coup against democracy and against a civilian president elected through the ballot box.”

The statement added, “The KIU believes this event undermines the will of the people and represents a return to military dictatorship and a defeat of the democratic process and freedom.”
Moreover, the statement also expressed the KIU's regret that the Egyptian forces and political figures who for years have been calling for freedom, democracy and protection of human rights and citizenship now resort to using military force in political conflicts.
It is worth mentioning that KIU is regarded as the Kurdish branch of the Muslim Brotherhood in Iraq.

Moreover, in 2005, its headquarters in the Dahuk province were attacked by the followers of the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP), headed by Iraqi Kurdistan Region of Iraq President Massoud Barzani. These attacks resulted in the death of a number of prominent executive officials. This occurred as a result of the KIU’s demands, including the elimination of administrative and political corruption in the region. Again, at the end of 2011, a pro-Barzani group attacked the party’s headquarters setting it on fire and wreaking havoc.

The opposition Islamic Group in Kurdistan, which, with four seats, is the fourth largest group in the Kurdistan regional parliament after the KIU, also condemned the overthrow of the Egyptian president, describing it as a dangerous event.

A statement signed by Ali Baber, the leader of the Islamic Group in Kurdistan, and issued on July 7, asserted, “This incident and the position of these secular parties and their supporting regimes and forces are proof that they implement democracy as they see fit, and that whenever Islam participates in the democratic process they will put an end to its participation, since they are using democracy only as a cover without really believing in it.”

In his statement, Baber indicated that the Islamic Salvation Front (FIS) in Algeria in 1992, the Turkish Welfare Party in 1996 and Hamas in Palestine in 2006, had the same fate as the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.

He added, “All of these forces won the elections, but thereafter a coup was staged by the secular dictatorship forces, and the will of the people voting for these forces in the elections was undermined.”
Baber stressed the need to give the Egyptian president a chance to complete his term, since he is the legitimate president of the country. “We cannot deny that there have been massive protests by citizens against Morsi and his government, and that millions of signatures were collected against him, but the truth remains that he was the legitimate president-elect and he was elected by millions of citizens,” Baber noted.

He added, “In a democratic and constitutional process, whoever gets the majority of votes shall rule, and everyone must abide by the president elected by said majority. The minority shall limit its demands within the scope of the law and the constitution, without breaching them.”

On a different note, political observers in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq had divergent opinions on the Islamic groups’ concerns regarding the recent development in Egypt and its future implications for them.

Kurdish writer Massoud Abdul Khaliq, a political analyst and official with the Standard Institute, an independent Kurdish media organization, told Al-Monitor that Egypt’s events will deeply affect Islamic parties in Kurdistan, especially the KIU.

“Given that the KIU is affiliated with the Brotherhood, these events will affect it morally. This was the case with the emergence of Islamist groups — in particular the Brotherhood — following the Arab Spring. The KIU had insisted on holding the elections in the region in a timely manner, since it believed this would garner a large number of votes following the victory of the Muslim Brotherhood in the countries witnessing the Arab Spring,” said Abdul Khaliq.

Mohammed Baziani, an Islamic researcher and the head of the al-Huda Center for Strategic Studies, founded in 1998, opines that Islamists in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq are still a weak force compared to the secular forces and that their positions toward the ousting of Morsi stem from sympathy for him and from their support for the democratic process in Egypt.

Speaking to Al-Monitor, Baziani added, “I think that this sympathy is normal given that what happened in Egypt is a coup against legitimacy, since the Kurdistan Islamists believe in a peaceful political process and transfer of power. This is why Kurdistan’s Islamic groups sympathize with the Egyptian president.”
Baziani pointed out that the closing of satellite channels affiliated with Islamic groups and the arrest of Islamic leaders in Egypt are against the democratic process and constitute a monopoly of power by the army and groups affiliated with secular movements.

[Anthea]

Religion does not and should not be involved in politics

Forgive me but my knowledge of Islam is not very good:

I thought that Muslims were supposed to support the government of the country they reside in ?

People who live under a Muslim leader - such as Egypt did - fear further Islamicfication - and with good reason - Egyptian economy relies heavily on tourism - they need to have a secular government in order to encourage the tourists to return

The Muslim Brotherhood have been offered a chance to take part in the new government but declined - if the government was not going to be run under Islamic law they want no part in forming that government - with that kind of attitude the Egyptian government is far better off without them